MEO Australia says Tassie Shoal LNG may cost $4 billion less than alternatives

Sydney (Platts)--15Nov2012/328 am EST/828 GMT


MEO Australia's proposed Tassie Shoal LNG project would cost up to $4 billion less than a similar-sized onshore or floating LNG development, the company said Thursday.

According to a cost estimate by engineering companies WorleyParsons and Arup, with input from APCI, a 3 million mt/year LNG project at Tassie Shoal LNG would cost $2 billion, including a contingency of 25%. An incremental investment of $220 million, or 11%, would be required to increase nameplate capacity by 30%, to 4 million mt/year, MEO said in a statement.

The company estimated that, when scaled to a 3.6 million mt/year capacity for comparison with the nearby Prelude FLNG project, the Tassie Shoal project held a capital cost of advantage of around $2 billion to $4 billion compared with onshore and FLNG alternatives.

"Additional activities to mature the engineering and cost estimates have been identified and will proceed commensurately with the commercial development of the project," MEO said.

Article continues below...


Request a free trial of: Oilgram NewsOilgram News
Oilgram News

Oilgram News brings fast-breaking global petroleum and gas news to your desktop every day. Our extensive global network of correspondents report on supply and demand trends, corporate news, government actions, exploration, technology, and much more.

Request a trial to Oilgram NewsRequest More Information

MEO holds 100% of the Tassie Shoal LNG project, which it plans to develop to commercialize its own gas, as well as stranded resources held by other companies around northwestern Australia. The project is adjacent to MEO's 50%-held Blackwood and Heron discoveries in the NT/P68 exploration permit, and about 400 km (248 miles) from MEO's wholly-owned WA-454P permit, where it is seeking farm-in partners.

MEO has already been granted Australian federal government environmental approvals for an LNG plant to be located at Tassie Shoal. The approval was first granted in 2004, but was reviewed and renewed in 2012.

The proposal also has "major project facilitation" status, conferred on it by the federal government's Department of Infrastructure and Transport.

--Christine Forster, christine_forster@platts.com --Edited by Robert DiNardo, robert_dinardo@platts.com