Renewable costs to continue slide, natural gas to rise: US FERC's Norris
Washington (Platts)--23Jul2012/1201 pm EDT/1601 GMT
The price of renewable energy technologies will continue to drop, while
the price of natural gas will rise, US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
member John Norris said Sunday, telling state regulators and others that
FERC's goal is to aid states in staying the course on renewables.
With natural gas prices so low, "some of you may think this is time to
bail" on renewables, Norris told state regulators from around the country at
the summer committee meetings of the National Association of Regulatory
Utility Commissioners in Portland, Oregon. During the discussion at NARUC's
"emerging issues" forum, however, some state regulators described the
difficulties of integrating renewable generation such as wind and solar.
While Norris did not specifically say states should continue to bolster
renewable portfolio standards (RPS), "my assumption is that they were started
because they were a good idea," he said.
Article continues below...
|
|
Commodity Pulse Video: Canada impacted by falling US natural gas prices
|
|
The extensive physical pipeline ties between the US and Canada and its reliance on those markets has long been a strength for Canada. But the fall of US natural gas prices has dragged Canadian gas prices down. In this video, John Kingston and Samantha Santa Maria discuss the ramifications of that link between the two countries and the fall in prices.
Watch the video
|
|
Norris said that the federal production tax credit (PTC) and state RPS
create market stabilities that are bringing the costs of renewable
technologies down, but the question is "how do you finish a good idea with
the mounting pressure that is building?" He added that renewables not only
assist in meeting clean energy goals but also increase diversity of fuel
supply.
He added that in many cases, when a large number of states adopt a
policy such as an RPS, there is tendency for the federal government to adopt
that policy, but this has not happened. The federal PTC is due to expire at
the end of 2012 and there has been little movement toward a national RPS.
Because of the PTC and RPS "we see investment in technologies in wind
and solar that dramatically brought the cost down and I think will continue
to bring the cost down," Norris said. A major challenge is changing the way
the grid is operated to accommodate changes in technology such as renewables,
he said. He also cautioned against selling the idea of renewables based on
job growth, because integration of new technologies can displace others, such
as those at traditional coal plants.
A study shows there are several states and regions that are not expected
to reach their RPS targets, including New England, the PJM Interconnection,
and California, said Sharon Reishus, senior director for consulting firm IHS
CERA, and a former member of the Maine Public Utilities Commission.
This is primarily due to transmission constraints and costs, she said.
She listed delivery constraints from the Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator into PJM as a primary factor in concluding that states in PJM
will not meet their targets. Investment will be needed to meet renewable
targets, she said.
This year will be last one for significant renewable development
because of the expiration of the PTC, until about 2015, when she said
political compromise may be reached on the PTC that would see it reinstated.
There will be "fairly significant growth" of renewables between 2015 and
2020, she said. Renewables as a portion of capacity is projected to increase
to 14% by 2020, with coal dropping from 30% to about 25%, she said.
"It's clear that federal policy has had a considerable impact on the
buildout of wind," she said, but added that "this really is driven by state
policy."
As to whether states will meet their targets, she said: "It's a
complicated question. Clearly transmission is a limiting factor for a number
of states.
She added: "It's going to be very challenging for a number of states to
actually meet those targets."
However, California Public Utilities Commission member Timothy Simon
said he disagreed with Reishus on whether California will meet its RPS goal
of electricity providers obtaining 33% of total procurement by 2020.
The state's 2011 RPS solicitation "was an extremely robust solicitation"
with more than 1100 new projects proposed, he said.
"We have a very, very, very aggressive bidding process right now," Simon
said, adding: "I view natural gas as the kissing cousin of renewables."
State regulators also discussed the difficulties of meeting RPS targets,
with Public Utility of Texas Chairwoman Donna Nelson saying that with so much
wind used in spring, generators using other types of fuel earn most of
their profits in summer. She added that it was difficult to make the economic
case for renewables in Texas with natural gas prices so low. The main
concern among Texans is reliability and the cost of electricity, she said.
"The only way we're going to make renewables work is with storage,"
Nelson added.
New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission member Michael Harrington said
that one utility's recent rate case had demonstrated a 50% increase in the
cost of compliance with the state's RPS. The costs of integrating renewables
were becoming much more significant, he said, adding: "I don't see anybody
building anything that they don't have a purchase power agreement with."
He said it was questionable how RPS goals can be met for projects unless
they have contracts for above-market rates, adding: "How far can we push this
before people say 'enough, the bills are getting too high?'"
--Jason Fordney, jason_fordney@platts.com
--Edited by Deepa Vijiyasingam, deepa_vijiyasingam@platts.com