If there is one thing this season of earnings conference calls is proving, it's how much the upstream industry likes a good rate of return on a productive play.  And one area where it's throwing some pretty massive bucks around to obtain those handsome return rates is the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, which has become one of the US' top fields in less than four years.
A recent proposal by a well-known energy economist has drawn some buzz in the market. In this week's Regulation & The Environment column from Platts Oilgram News, Meghan Gordon looks at the issue.

When US state utility regulators meet in Washington next week for their annual winter conference, one of the themes they will cover -- to a larger or smaller extent -- will be states versus the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

One state regulator is throwing down a big glove, the Constitution, in what reads like a profoundly felt fist-shaking against efforts to plan and pay for power systems more centrally.

Saudi Arabia's petrochemical paradox

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

For anyone observing from the outside, Saudi Arabia's petrochemical manufacturers would seem little more than a vast, cash generating machine. Given that it has the world's largest hydrocarbon reserves and a huge line-up of investments (estimates hover in a wide range of $20 billion to $100 billion over the next five years) from both prosperous government and foreign investors, it's an image that's hard to argue against.

However, the financial results for the fourth quarter of 2011 of many of these Saudi companies reveal a very different picture indeed. While petrochemical giant like Sabic showed a drop in net income Q4 2011, others, like Saudi Kayan and Petrochem, in fact showed net losses.

Saudi Arabia's petrochemical industries index dropped 1.65%, or 103.12 basis points year-on-year on December 31, 2011 to 6232.93.

The weekly Energy Information Administration report revealed a continued decline in Americans' demand for petroleum. You can read Platts' analysis about it here.

Saudi Arabia throws its hat in the ring for OPEC's top job

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

By Margaret McQuaile and Kate Dourian

Who will be OPEC's next secretary general after Abdalla el-Badri, who will finish his second three-year term in the job at the end of this year? OPEC kingpin Saudi Arabia has nominated its former OPEC governor Majid Moneef but it's unlikely that he will be the only candidate.

You might think that choosing a secretary general to run the Vienna secretariat would be a fairly simple affair. But it's not. Politics and geopolitics tend to spill over from crude output policy into the process of filling the group's top job.

Not everyone is cheering Australia's LNG boom

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Not everyone standing on the sidelines is cheering Australia's play to challenge Qatar as the world's largest LNG producer by the middle of this decade.

LNG is a boom industry in Australia, with eight new projects currently under construction, worth a total of more than $175 billion. The new projects will add capacity of nearly 70 million mt/year to Australia's existing LNG industry, which comprises the Woodside Petroleum-led 16.3 million mt/year North West Shelf joint venture and the 3.6 million mt/year Darwin LNG
plant, operated by ConocoPhillips.

(John Roberts was a guest lecturer on energy security at the NATO Partnership for Peace Symposium at Oberammergau earlier this month.)

When NATO looks at Iran it would seem reasonable to expect that it was looking at how the western world's warships are cramming into the Strait of Hormuz amidst charge and counter-charge that the strait faces the prospect of an Iranian blockade.

But when NATO invites its partners in the region -- countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iraq, Jordan and Egypt are all members of NATO's Partnership for Peace program -- for an informal symposium on issues of mutual interest, it's not just energy security that's up for discussion, but cyber security, water and the problems posed by declining military budgets.

In this US election year, nearly every politician campaigning at the federal level, no matter the party, wants to improve "energy independence" and "energy security." The catchphrases invoke American can-do-ism and let candidates inject the slightest economic and foreign policy knowledge into their pitches without having to get bogged down in the details.

It's almost as if these politicians want to sew red, white and blue "Made in USA" tags onto hydrocarbons.

Europe couldn't be more different. Consider BP's recent prediction that EU countries will import 80% of the natural gas they consume by 2030, despite having significant shale gas potential.
Battles over the environmental impact of shale gas are a now well-entrenched part of a debate over US energy policy. But they're not limited just to the US, as Jacinta Moran discusses in the "At the Wellhead" column from Platts Oilgram News.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Twitter Updates

Recent Comments

  • John Kingston: And Rodney, wait until we get into the issues with read more
  • Gerald Karey: I appreciate that the administration and BOEM are under intense read more
  • Adam: Retiring from one office to run for another is hardly read more
  • Steve Shawver: John, There is a company in Texas, Synfuels International that read more
  • Matt Pitzarella: Doug Shields is auditioning for his next job in his read more

Archives

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29